Array
(
    [fullTitle] => OMNIPOTENCE, GAPS, AND CURRY
    [abstract] => 
In “God of the Gaps: A Neglected Reply to God’s Stone Problem”, Jc Beall and A. J. Cotnoir offer a gappy solution to the paradox of (unrestricted) omnipotence  that  is  typified  by  the  classic  stone  problem.  Andrew  Tedder  and Guillermo Badia, however, have recently argued that this solution could not be extended to a more serious Curry-like version of the paradox. In this paper, we show that such a gappy solution does extend to it

    [authors] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [givenName] => Jeremiah Joven
                    [affiliation] => De La Salle University
                )

        )

    [keywords] => Array
        (
            [0] => Curry’s paradox
            [1] => gappy logic
            [2] => paradox of omnipotence
            [3] => unrestricted omnipotence
        )

    [doi] => 10.24204/ejpr.2022.3796
    [datePublished] => 2022-12-16
    [pdf] => https://www.philosophy-of-religion.eu/menuscript/index.php/ejpr/article/view/3796/version/1181/2979
)
"Loading..."

OMNIPOTENCE, GAPS, AND CURRY

Jeremiah Joven
De La Salle University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2022.3796

Abstract

In “God of the Gaps: A Neglected Reply to God’s Stone Problem”, Jc Beall and A. J. Cotnoir offer a gappy solution to the paradox of (unrestricted) omnipotence  that  is  typified  by  the  classic  stone  problem.  Andrew  Tedder  and Guillermo Badia, however, have recently argued that this solution could not be extended to a more serious Curry-like version of the paradox. In this paper, we show that such a gappy solution does extend to it

Keywords: Curry’s paradox

Download PDF