Array
(
    [fullTitle] => Supernatural Explanations and Inspirations
    [abstract] => 

I propose, in partial response to the rich essays by Millican & Thornhill-Miller and Salamon that religious traditions are too diverse to be represented either by a cosmological core or even (though this is more plausible) an ethical. Religious sensibility is more often inspirational than explanatory, does not always require a transcendent origin of all things (however reasonable that thesis may be in the abstract), and does not always support the sort of humanistic values preferred in the European Enlightenment. A widely shared global religion is more likely to be eclectic than carefully ‘rational’, and is likely to be opposed by a more overtly ‘supernatural’ project founded in revelation.

[authors] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [givenName] => Stephen R. L. [affiliation] => University of Liverpool ) ) [keywords] => Array ( ) [doi] => 10.24204/ejpr.v9i3.1990 [datePublished] => 2017-09-21 [pdf] => https://www.philosophy-of-religion.eu/menuscript/index.php/ejpr/article/view/1990/version/470/1593 )
"Loading..."

Supernatural Explanations and Inspirations

Stephen R. L.
University of Liverpool

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v9i3.1990

Abstract

I propose, in partial response to the rich essays by Millican & Thornhill-Miller and Salamon that religious traditions are too diverse to be represented either by a cosmological core or even (though this is more plausible) an ethical. Religious sensibility is more often inspirational than explanatory, does not always require a transcendent origin of all things (however reasonable that thesis may be in the abstract), and does not always support the sort of humanistic values preferred in the European Enlightenment. A widely shared global religion is more likely to be eclectic than carefully ‘rational’, and is likely to be opposed by a more overtly ‘supernatural’ project founded in revelation.

Keywords:

Download PDF