Array
(
    [fullTitle] => ”Anti-theodicy” and Antitheodicies
    [abstract] => The article reviews different antitheodicies in response to Toby Betenson’s article “Anti-Theodicy”. Antitheodicies involve rejecting the position that God or meaning exist only, if evils have justifying morally sufficient reasons. The article builds on Betenson’s division into moral and conceptual antitheodicies and his characterization of antitheodicies as a metacritique of the problem of evil. Moral antitheodicies are problematic, as they do not address the key conceptual issues and might end up in question-begging or moralism. Dissolving the problem of evil requires a conceptual antitheodicy that exposes its presuppositions as speculative metaphysics. Religious conceptual antitheodicies help to focus on different ways of sense-making that do not fall into theodicism.
    [authors] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [givenName] => Lauri
                    [affiliation] => University of Helsinki
                )

        )

    [keywords] => Array
        (
            [0] => problem of evil
            [1] => antitheodicy
            [2] => metaphysics
            [3] => philosophical methodology
            [4] => Betenson
            [5] => Toby
        )

    [doi] => 10.24204/ejpr.v11i1.2579
    [datePublished] => 2019-03-17
    [pdf] => https://www.philosophy-of-religion.eu/menuscript/index.php/ejpr/article/view/2579/version/523/2272
)
"Loading..."

”Anti-theodicy” and Antitheodicies

Lauri
University of Helsinki

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v11i1.2579

Abstract

The article reviews different antitheodicies in response to Toby Betenson’s article “Anti-Theodicy”. Antitheodicies involve rejecting the position that God or meaning exist only, if evils have justifying morally sufficient reasons. The article builds on Betenson’s division into moral and conceptual antitheodicies and his characterization of antitheodicies as a metacritique of the problem of evil. Moral antitheodicies are problematic, as they do not address the key conceptual issues and might end up in question-begging or moralism. Dissolving the problem of evil requires a conceptual antitheodicy that exposes its presuppositions as speculative metaphysics. Religious conceptual antitheodicies help to focus on different ways of sense-making that do not fall into theodicism.

Keywords: problem of evil

Download PDF