Array
(
    [fullTitle] => The Vagueness of Religious Beliefs
    [abstract] => 

My paper characterizes religious beliefs in terms of vagueness. I introduce my topic by providing a general overview of my main claims. In the subsequent section, I develop basic distinctions and terminology for handling the notion of religious tradition and capturing (religious) vagueness. In the following sections, I make the case for my claim that religious beliefs are vague by developing a general argument from the interconnection between the referential opacity of religious belief content and the long-term communitarian history of the precisification of what such content means. I start from describing an empirical example in the third section, and then I move to settle the matter in a conceptually argumentative frame in the fourth one. My conclusions in the final section address a few of consequences relevant to debates about religious epistemology and religious diversity.

[authors] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [givenName] => Daniele [affiliation] => University of Rome, Tor Vergata ) ) [keywords] => Array ( [0] => Analytic Philosophy of Religion [1] => Religious Belief [2] => Epistemology of Religious Belief [3] => Vagueness ) [doi] => 10.24204/ejpr.v12i2.2937 [datePublished] => 2020-06-30 [pdf] => https://www.philosophy-of-religion.eu/menuscript/index.php/ejpr/article/view/2937/version/616/2671 )
"Loading..."

The Vagueness of Religious Beliefs

Daniele
University of Rome, Tor Vergata

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v12i2.2937

Abstract

My paper characterizes religious beliefs in terms of vagueness. I introduce my topic by providing a general overview of my main claims. In the subsequent section, I develop basic distinctions and terminology for handling the notion of religious tradition and capturing (religious) vagueness. In the following sections, I make the case for my claim that religious beliefs are vague by developing a general argument from the interconnection between the referential opacity of religious belief content and the long-term communitarian history of the precisification of what such content means. I start from describing an empirical example in the third section, and then I move to settle the matter in a conceptually argumentative frame in the fourth one. My conclusions in the final section address a few of consequences relevant to debates about religious epistemology and religious diversity.

Keywords: Analytic Philosophy of Religion

Download PDF